Courtroom Victories
In The News
What Our Clients Say

By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney

This is the tenth part of a series of posts about what evidence can, cannot, should, and should not, be used in court.

Part X, Privileges – Can Your Husband or Wife Testify Against You?

Many people believe that marriage is an institution that is good for society.  That is, many people hold the belief that married people are more stable and likely to contribute good things to society.  Many people also believe that homes with two parents are better environments in which to raise children.  People also generally hold the belief that things said and done between husband and wife ought to be entitled to some privacy.  The law, if nothing else, tends evolve and exist roughly in parallel with what society believes to be best.  Thus, it should come as no surprise that the law tries to support marriages and goes out of its way to avoid breaking them asunder.  Few things, after all, will destroy a marriage faster than one spouse testifying against the other.  For this reason, most states acknowledge some form of marital or spousal privilege.

In Ohio, there are really two types of what might be called spousal privilege, or marital privilege.  These are called spousal privilege and spousal competency.

Competency, remembering back to prior blog posts, is the question of whether a witness is the sort of person who can testify.  In Ohio everyone is competent to testify except for a few specific categories of people.  One of these categories is people who are being compelled to testify against their spouse.  Under Ohio law, a witness-spouse is “incompetent” to testify unless the witness voluntarily chooses to testify or the witness is testifying against their spouse in a crime that was committed by the spouse against the witness or a child of either the spouse or the witness.  For example, a wife may choose not testify against her husband unless the husband’s crime was committed against the wife or their child.  However, it should be noted that the point of this privilege is to preserve marriage by not creating a situation where the government could force an unwilling spouse to implicate their beloved in a crime (or other similar situation).  Thus, if the witness and defendant are unmarried at the time when one of them is to testify (even if they were married when the crime or incident underlying the case occurred) the competency issue does not arise and the witness will have to testify.

Spousal privilege, however, is somewhat different from competency.  Privilege exists to fulfill society’s expectation that things said and done between husband and wife are private and that privacy should be respected.  Thus, Ohio law protects things said or done, by spouses, in the each other’s presence, while they are married, as long as no third person is present.  This is different from competency because in this case, for example, even if a wife wants to testify about something she saw or something that was said in the privacy of the marriage, her husband can prevent her from testifying about it.  However, unlike the case of competency, the witness is not entirely excused from testifying, only the specific privileged acts or communications are private.  That is, the witness could still testify, if she wanted to, about anything that was said or done in front of a third person.  But acts or communications shared between spouses without anyone else present are protected.  Moreover, the protection does not disappear when the marriage does.  If two people were married when they shared some private act or communication and they subsequently divorce, the act or communication is still privileged.

In short, spouses generally do not have to take the witness stand against each other if they do not want to.  But, even in some cases where they might want to, they cannot do it if what they want to testify about is something that happened in the privacy of the marriage and the other spouse does not want them to.

If you are under investigation, or have been arrested by any law enforcement agency, feel free to contact one of our experienced Criminal Defense Attorneys, for a free initial consultation about your legal rights and possible defenses.  In addition, if you have been wrongfully convicted, arrested, imprisoned, maliciously prosecuted, or have suffered some other wrong, feel free to contact one of our experienced Civil Attorneys, for a free initial consultation.

What Is Opening the Door? Evidence – Part IX

by toleary on December 18, 2012

By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney

This is the ninth part of a series of posts about what evidence can, cannot, should, and should not, be used in court.

Part IX, Character Evidence Revisited – Opening the Door.

Shortly prior to the date of this article, the Ohio Supreme Court issued an opinion in, State of Ohio v. Van Williams, addressing the question of when bad things a person may have done in the past can be used against them.

In Van Williams, the defendant apparently had sexual relationships with two teenage boys, one in approximately 1997 and one in 2008.  The state sought to, and did, use evidence of the 1997 relationship in order to convict him of the 2008 relationship.  The 1997 relationship resulted in a misdemeanor conviction and under ordinary circumstances, since the conviction is over ten years old, it could not have been used against Van Williams.  In addition, remember from prior posts, the State cannot use evidence that someone has a bad character to show that they acted in conformity with that bad character on a particular occasion.  That is, just because Mr. Van Williams had a sexual relationship with one young man over ten years before, does not mean that he did again in this case.  However, the Ohio Supreme Court said that the evidence of the prior relationship was properly used against Mr. Van Williams.

The evidence was relevant, said the Court, in that it tended to show intent and plan by Van Williams.  In other words, the manner in which Mr. Van Williams cultivated his relationship with these two boys was, apparently, quite similar between the two scenarios.  Thus, the evidence showed a deliberate and purposeful method of seducing young men.

However, also important to the Ohio Supreme Court’s analysis, was what Van Williams argued at trial:  Van Williams’ defense counsel apparently argued (among other things) that Van Williams was not interested in homosexual activities and therefore the accusing witness was lying.  Because the Defense chose to take this approach, the importance of the prior sexual relationship increased greatly.  That is, the prior relationship showed that Van Williams was, in fact, interested in homosexual relationships with young men.  This is what is known as “opening the door.”  When the Defense chose to argue broadly about Mr. Van Williams’ sexual preferences, the testimony about the older incident became much more relevant and, consequently, much more likely to be admitted into evidence.  If Van Williams had focused more on arguing that he did not, in fact, molest this particular young man, the evidence about the prior incident would have been much less useful to the State and thus less likely to be admissible.  To put it another way, if the State had not needed to use the prior relationship to refute Van Williams’ claims that he was not interested in homosexual activities with young men, it might have been more obvious that the main purpose of bringing up the prior relationship was to lead the jury to the impermissible inference that Van Williams must have molested this young man in 2008 because in 1997 he had a sexual relationship with another young man.

In short, if you are going to argue that a piece of evidence should not be heard in court because it would be unfair, you and your attorney must develop a theory of the case that does not take unfair advantage of the missing evidence.  If your theory can be refuted by the evidence you are attempting to exclude, the importance (or, probative value) of the evidence you are seeking to exclude will be much higher.  If your own strategy makes evidence you want to exclude important, it is much more likely a judge will choose not to exclude it.

If you are under investigation, or have been arrested by any law enforcement agency, feel free to contact one of our experienced Criminal Defense Attorneys, for a free initial consultation about your legal rights and possible defenses.  In addition, if you have been wrongfully convicted, arrested, imprisoned, maliciously prosecuted, or have suffered some other wrong, feel free to contact one of our experienced Civil Attorneys, for a free initial consultation.

What Is Attorney-Client Privilege? Evidence – Part VIII

November 15, 2012

By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the eighth part of a series of posts about what evidence can, cannot, should, and should not, be used in court. Part VIII, Rules to Help Society – Privileges and the Attorney-Client Privilege. In addition to the general rules about what [...]

Read the full article →

It’s Official: Man Was Wrongfully Convicted

November 2, 2012

By  Randy Ludlow The Columbus Dispatch, Thursday November 1, 2012.  (The same story also ran on October 31, 2012 under the heading “Man who served on Death Row declared wrongfully imprisoned”). After spending seven years on Death Row for a pair of now-three-decade-old murders that he didn’t commit, Dale Johnston feels he finally has pocketed [...]

Read the full article →

What Good Are Evidence Rules? Evidence – Part VII

October 25, 2012

By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the seventh part of a series of posts about what evidence can, cannot, should, and should not, be used in court. Part VII, Good for Society – Remedial Measures, Settlement Discussions, Offers to Pay Medical Expenses Some of the previous posts [...]

Read the full article →

What Are Some Common Exceptions To Hearsay? Evidence – Part VI

October 9, 2012

By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the sixth part of a series of posts about what evidence can, cannot, should, and should not, be used in court. Part VI, Exceptions to Hearsay – Avoiding Injustice It may seem that the hearsay rule would make court proceedings very [...]

Read the full article →

Are Police Reports Hearsay? Evidence – Part V

October 1, 2012

By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the fifth part of a series of posts about what evidence can, cannot, should, and should not, be used in court. Part V, Police Reports as Hearsay Police reports are hearsay.  They are something the officer stated (in this case wrote) outside [...]

Read the full article →

What Is Hearsay? Evidence – Part IV

September 26, 2012

By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the fourth part of a series of posts about what evidence can, cannot, should, and should not, be used in court. Part IV, Hearsay Most people think, and they are right, that hearsay is not allowed in court.  Most people also [...]

Read the full article →

Is Character Evidence Admissible? Evidence – Part III

August 29, 2012

By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the third part of a series of posts about what evidence can, cannot, should, and should not, be used in court. Part III, Character Assassinations Are Usually Forbidden You cannot, in any legal proceeding, criminal or civil, introduce evidence of a [...]

Read the full article →

Who Can Testify In Court? Evidence – Part II

June 26, 2012

By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the second part of a series of posts about what evidence can, cannot, should, and should not, be used in court. Part II, Almost All Witness Can Testify, But Not All Should In medieval times, serfs (very poor folk) generally could [...]

Read the full article →

What Is Relevant Evidence In A Legal Case? Evidence – Part I

June 22, 2012

By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the first part of a series of posts about what evidence can, cannot, should, and should not, be used in court. Part I, Relevance Almost everyone has an idea about what relevance means.  In everyday use it means having significant and [...]

Read the full article →

What Are The Rules Of Evidence? Evidence – Introduction

June 22, 2012

By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the introduction to a series of posts about what evidence can, cannot, should, and should not, be used in court. Introduction: Objection!  Relevance. Objection!  Hearsay. These terms have common, everyday, meanings and for this reason most people probably think they know [...]

Read the full article →

Should You Take A Breathalyzer Or Chemical Test? Police Interaction, Part XVII

June 5, 2012

Should You Take A Breathalyzer Or Chemical Test?  Police Interaction, Part XVII By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the seventeenth part in a series of posts about what legal obligations you have when you interact with the police. Situation 17 You have been arrested on suspicion of drunk driving [...]

Read the full article →

What Does The New Texting And Driving Law Mean? – Part I

June 3, 2012

By Columbus Criminal Defense Attorney, Todd A. Long Recently, Governor Kasich signed a texting while driving ban into law.  This new law is codified under Ohio Revised Code section 4511.204, and for those under 18 with a temporary permit or a probationary license, section 4511.205 applies.  This is the first in a series of articles [...]

Read the full article →

Should You Take Roadside Sobriety Tests? Police Interaction, Part XVI

May 30, 2012

Should You Take Roadside Sobriety Tests?  Police Interaction, Part XVI By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the sixteenth part in a series of posts about what legal obligations you have when you interact with the police. Situation 16 You and your friends have been to a bar.  You’ve had [...]

Read the full article →

What Should You Do When You’re Under Arrest? Police Interaction, Part XV

May 29, 2012

What Should You Do When You’re Under Arrest?  Police Interaction, Part XV By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the fifteenth part in a series of posts about what legal obligations you have when you interact with the police. Situation 15 You have been arrested for robbing a liquor store.  [...]

Read the full article →

How Do You Know If You’re Under Arrest? Police Interaction, Part XIV

May 2, 2012

How Do You Know If You’re Under Arrest?  Police Interaction, Part XIV By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the fourteenth part in a series of posts about what legal obligations you have when you interact with the police. Situation 14 Suppose you are walking along the sidewalk.  Seeing someone [...]

Read the full article →

Where Are You Going In Such A Hurry? Police Interaction, Part XIII

April 23, 2012

Where Are You Going In Such A Hurry?  Police Interaction, Part XIII By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the thirteenth part in a series of posts about what legal obligations you have when you interact with the police. Situation 13 You’ve late for a very important meeting.  So you’re [...]

Read the full article →

Is It Ever Permissible To Resist A Police Officer? Police Interaction, Part XII

April 20, 2012

Is It Ever Permissible To Resist A Police Officer?  Police Interaction, Part XII By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the twelfth part in a series of posts about what legal obligations you have when you interact with the police. Situation 12 You’re out with a group of friends, some [...]

Read the full article →

Must You Submit To Canine Sniff During A Traffic Stop? Police Interaction, Part XI

April 12, 2012

Must You Submit To Canine Sniff During A Traffic Stop?  Police Interaction, Part XI By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the eleventh part in a series of posts about what legal obligations you have when you interact with the police. Situation 11 You’re driving on a quiet residential street [...]

Read the full article →

When Are You Free To Leave A Traffic Stop? Police Interaction, Part X

March 23, 2012

When Are You Free To Leave A Traffic Stop?  Police Interaction, Part X By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the tenth part in a series of posts about what legal obligations you have when you interact with the police. Situation 10 You have been pulled over at the side [...]

Read the full article →

Must You Get Out Of Your Car During A Traffic Stop? Police Interaction, Part IX

March 16, 2012

Must You Get Out Of Your Car During A Traffic Stop?  Police Interaction, Part IX By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the ninth part in a series of posts about what legal obligations you have when you interact with the police. Situation 9 You have been pulled over at [...]

Read the full article →

Is Growing Marijuana (“Marijuana Cultivation”) A Crime In Ohio?

February 12, 2012

Growing Marijuana (“Marijuana Cultivation”): Is It A Crime In Ohio? By James D. Owen, Criminal Defense Attorney from Columbus, Ohio Cultivation of marijuana is a billion dollar business that, under limited conditions, is legal in some states – but not in Ohio, and not under federal law.  In Ohio, cultivation of marijuana can be a serious [...]

Read the full article →

Murder Charges Dropped In Case Defended By Columbus Attorneys James Owen And Todd Long

January 1, 2012

Murder Charges Dropped In Columbus Homicide Case By James D. Owen, Criminal Defense Lawyer in Columbus, Ohio On the motion of Columbus Defense Attorneys James D. Owen and Todd A. Long, Franklin County prosecutors dismissed Murder charges against Columbus resident Cortez L. Montgomery.  At a hearing held on Monday, June 28, 2010, Prosecutors advised the [...]

Read the full article →

What Is “Simple” Assault Under Ohio Law?

December 25, 2011

The least serious assault offense under Ohio law is  the crime of “simple” Assault.   There are two ways the crime of “simple” Assault can be committed in Ohio: (1) by knowingly causing or attempting to cause physical harm to another, and (2) by recklessly causing serious physical harm to another. Simple Assault is a misdemeanor of the first degree, [...]

Read the full article →

What Is Aggravated Assault In Ohio? Part I: Elements, Penalties, And Defenses

December 21, 2011

What is Aggravated Assault in Ohio?  Part I:  Elements, Penalties, and Defenses By James D. Owen, Criminal Defense Attorney in Columbus, Ohio Other than Felonious Assault, the crime of Aggravated Assault is the most serious type of assault offense in Ohio.  A person is guilty of the crime of Aggravated Assault if that person knowingly commits [...]

Read the full article →

When Must You Display Your License? Police Interaction, Part VIII

December 17, 2011

When Must You Display Your License?  Police Interaction, Part VIII By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the eighth part in a series of posts about what legal obligations you have when you interact with the police. Situation 8 You are driving along listening to the radio.  Suddenly, flashing lights [...]

Read the full article →

What Is Felonious Assault In Ohio? Felonious Assault: Part I

December 13, 2011

What is Felonious Assault in Ohio?  Part I:  Elements, Penalties, and Defenses By James D. Owen, Criminal Defense Attorney located in Columbus, Ohio The most serious assault offense under Ohio law is the crime of Felonious Assault.  There are three ways the Felonious Assault can be committed in Ohio: (1) knowingly causing serious physical harm to [...]

Read the full article →

Do You Have to Pull Over Even When You’ve Broken No Law? Police Interaction, Part VII

December 12, 2011

Do You Have to Pull Over Even When You’ve Broken No Law?  Police Interaction, Part VII By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the seventh part in a series of posts about what legal obligations you have when you interact with the police. Situation 7 You are driving along the [...]

Read the full article →

What Are The Boundaries Of A Pat-Down Search? Police Interaction, Part VI

December 9, 2011

What Are The Boundaries Of A Pat-Down Search?  Police Interaction, Part VI By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the sixth part in a series of posts about what legal obligation you have when you interact with the police and the third part of a three-part sub-series that deals with [...]

Read the full article →

Can You Refuse An Illegal Pat-Down Search? Police Interaction, Part V

December 8, 2011

Can You Refuse An Illegal Pat-Down Search?  Police Interaction, Part V By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the fifth part in a series of posts about what legal obligation you have when you interact with the police and the second part of a three-part sub-series that will deal with [...]

Read the full article →

What Is Domestic Violence In Ohio? Part II: Parental Discipline

December 4, 2011

What Is Domestic Violence In Ohio?  Part II: Parental Discipline By James D. Owen, Columbus Criminal Defense Attorney Often we represent clients who are charged with domestic violence for physically disciplining their children.  Parents and guardians of children are often erroneously charged with Domestic Violence for 2 reasons.  First, in Ohio, the crime of domestic [...]

Read the full article →

What Is Domestic Violence In Ohio? Part I: Elements Of The Offense

December 3, 2011

What Is Domestic Violence in Ohio?  Part I: Elements of  the Offense By Jim Owen, Columbus Criminal Defense Attorney In Ohio, Section 2919.25 of the Ohio Revised Code defines the criminal offense of Domestic Violence.  There are three ways to commit the crime of Domestic Violence.  The first is set forth in Section 2919.25(A), which makes it [...]

Read the full article →

The Right To Self-Defense In Ohio. Part IV: The Defense Of Others

November 27, 2011

The Right To Self-Defense In Ohio.  Part IV:  The Defense Of Others By James Owen, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer If a person believes that a family member or other person, even a stranger,  is in imminent danger of bodily harm, then that person may use reasonably necessary force to defend that other person, to the same [...]

Read the full article →

Limitations On Your Right To Self-Defense In Ohio. Part III: The First Aggressor Rule

November 26, 2011

Limitations On Your Right To Self-Defense In Ohio.  Part III: The First Aggressor Rule By James D. Owen, Columbus Criminal Defense Attorney A person who starts an altercation may not thereafter lawfully use force to defend himself during the altercation he started.  This so-called “not-at-fault” rule means that an accused who claims to have acted in self-defense must not have been the [...]

Read the full article →

What Is Your Right To Self-Defense In Ohio? Part II: Using Nondeadly Force

November 22, 2011

What Is Your Right To Self-Defense In Ohio.  Part II: Using Nondeadly Force By James D. Owen, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer Under Ohio law, a person may use reasonable force to defend or protect oneself, even when faced with a danger less than death or great bodily harm.  See State v. Fox, 36 Ohio App. [...]

Read the full article →

What Is A Pat-Down Search? Police Interaction, Part IV

November 22, 2011

What Is A Pat-Down Search?  Police Interaction, Part IV By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the fourth part in a series of posts about what legal obligation you have when you interact with the police and the first part of a three-part sub-series that will deal with pat-down searches. [...]

Read the full article →

Do You Have The Right To Self-Defense in Ohio? Part I: Deadly Force

November 20, 2011

Do You Have The Right To Self-Defense In Ohio?  Part I: Using Deadly Force By Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer, James D. Owen In Ohio, a person has a legal right to use force to defend himself, another person, his house, or even his property.  The level of force that may be lawfully used varies, of course, [...]

Read the full article →

Should I Take A Police Polygraph (“Lie Detector”) Test?

November 15, 2011

Should I Take A Police Polygraph (“Lie Detector”) Test? By Columbus Criminal Defense Attorney, James D. Owen On a regular basis, clients under criminal investigation are contacted by the police and asked if they will  take a police polygraph test. Before you make a decision about whether to submit to a polygraph examination, you should first consult with [...]

Read the full article →

Do You Have To Identify Yourself To The Police? Police Interaction, Part III

November 2, 2011

Do You Have To Identify Yourself To The Police?  Police Interaction, Part III By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the third part in a series of posts about what legal obligation you have when you interact with the police.  The second post dealt with the question of when one [...]

Read the full article →

When Do You Need To Answer Questions Posed By The Police? Police Interaction, Part II

October 23, 2011

When Do You Need To Answer Questions Posed By The Police?  Police Interaction, Part II By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyer and Civil Rights Attorney This is the second part in a series of posts about what legal obligation you have when you interact with the police.  The first post dealt with the question of [...]

Read the full article →

When Do You Need To Stop For The Police? Police Interactions, Part I

October 19, 2011

By Benjamin A. Tracy, Columbus Criminal Defense and Civil Rights Attorney When Do You Need To Stop and Identify Yourself To The Police?  Part I Let an experienced Columbus Defense Attorney share some insights from his experiences with clients who have interacted poorly with the police. No matter who you are, an encounter with the police is [...]

Read the full article →

Is It A Crime To Possess Child Pornography In Ohio?

October 15, 2011

Under both Ohio and federal law, it is a crime to possess child pornography. Under federal law (18 U.S.C. 2252), it is a criminal offense to knowingly possess, manufacture, distribute, or access with intent to view, child pornography.  In a related statute (18 U.S.C. 2256), child pornography is defined as a visual depiction of sexually [...]

Read the full article →

Is It A Crime To Sell Counterfeit Goods?

October 15, 2011

Counterfeit goods worth $8 million were seized at a Columbus flea market on Friday, October 7, 2011.  Detectives from the Franklin County Sheriff’s Office confiscated more than 41,000 items, including purses, wallets, clothing, shoes, CDs and DVDs, Sunglasses, jewelery, and clothes.  Detectives said the counterfeit items were being sold in violatation of  federal trademark laws. [...]

Read the full article →

What If You Are Arrested For Your Friend’s Drugs?

October 14, 2011

If you are charged in Columbus with possession of drugs that belonged to a friend or someone else in your car or home, then you should promptly contact an experienced Columbus criminal attorney to represent you. In Central Ohio it is common for a person to be charged with possesson of drugs that actually belonged [...]

Read the full article →

Who Is Eligible For Diversion?

October 13, 2011

In Franklin County (Columbus) Ohio, a 1st time offender of a non-violent offense may be eligible for acceptance into Diversion.  Under this program, which is administered by the Franklin County Prosecutor’s Office, Diversion is generally available for non-violent felony offenders, including persons charged with Theft, Receiving Stolen Property, Child Support Violations, and possession of drugs [...]

Read the full article →

What Are The Limits On Prison For 4th And 5th Degree Felonies?

October 10, 2011

Effective September 30, 2011, H.B. 86 imposes strict limits on prison for 4th and 5th degree felony crimes committed in Ohio.  In fact, the bill prohibits direct prison sentences for certain 4th and 5th degree felonies.  Mandatory community control (probation) for one year is generally required if the most serious charge is the 4th or 5th degree felony, the offense [...]

Read the full article →

What Is The Difference Between A Misdemeanor And A Felony In Ohio?

October 9, 2011

In Ohio, criminal offenses are divided into Misdemeanors and Felonies based on their maximum potential punishment.  The maximum penalty for a misdemeanor in Ohio is up to 6 months in jail and/or a $1,000 fine.   Felonies have potential sentences that are far more severe and can result in imprisonment in the Department of Rehabilitation and [...]

Read the full article →

Columbus Criminal Defense Attorneys Jim Owen And Todd Long Win Not Guilty Verdict In Felonious Assault Trial

October 8, 2011

On Friday morning, September 2, 2011, after less than 30 minutes of deliberation, a Franklin County Common Please Jury returned a unanimous verdict of Not Guilty in the felonious assault case in State of Ohio v. Penick.  Columbus Criminal Defense Lawyers Jim Owen and Todd Long represented Penick in the 4-day long jury trial.  If [...]

Read the full article →

What Is Bail? And How Can You Be Released From Jail On Bond?

October 7, 2011

Under Ohio law, there are 3 allowable types of Bond. The first, and least restrictive type of Bond is an Unsecured or Recognizance Bond.  This is generally referred to as an “O.R.” or “Signature” Bond.  A Recognizance Bond does not require any payment of money, and is no more than a unsecured promise by the [...]

Read the full article →